St. Gotthard / San Gottardo is 1.09 times the length of Tiantaishan, and it is the ratio rather than the 1.38 km that says how differently the two crossings had to be ventilated and escaped. 49 recorded structures are longer than St. Gotthard / San Gottardo, the nearest of them Yongshouliang at 17.16 km.
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo belongs to the 1980s and Tiantaishan to the 2020s, two decades in which what a tunnel had to provide by way of escape and ventilation was not the same thing. A disused rail bore is the commonest cycleway in some countries, which is a second life a length ranking cannot show.
Both are recorded in this archive as road tunnels, so the measurement convention is identical and the comparison is direct. Both rows are reachable from the road tunnel table they were taken from, where the note column carries the tube count, the gradient and any reconstruction St. Gotthard / San Gottardo or Tiantaishan has had.
- 5entries listed
Side by side
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo is recorded on data/tun10.html and Tiantaishan on data/tun10.html, compiled to the same convention, which is what makes the two figures comparable at all.
How this archive measures: lengths, bores, dates and ordering
| Measure | St. Gotthard / San Gottardo | Tiantaishan |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 16.94 km | 15.56 km |
| Length in metres | 16 942 m | 15 560 m |
| Opened | 1980 | 2021 |
| Class | road tunnel | road tunnel |
| Difference | 1.38 km longer | — |
How this table is compiled
Among the road tunnels this archive records, St. Gotthard / San Gottardo stands 6th by length and Tiantaishan 7th, adjacent in the ranking. The median road tunnel in this archive measures 12.46 km, so both entries here are well clear of the ordinary case and the comparison is between two outliers rather than two typical crossings.
A 41-year gap spans real changes in ventilation, escape provision and excavation method, so the two were not built to the same standard. The 1980s account for 25 entries in this archive, and St. Gotthard / San Gottardo is one of them, which is the context a single opening date does not carry on its own.
This archive separates 4 classes of structure and both entries here are indexed under road tunnel, which decides the table each is ranked in and the convention its length was measured by. Spoil from a long bore is a civil work of its own, and outside several alpine portals it has become a permanent landform.
That gap is about 8 per cent of the longer bore, which is the figure worth holding on to rather than the raw metres. Driven end to end the two would run 32.5 km, which is the figure to hold against the 24.51 km of the longest single road tunnel in the record.
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo and Tiantaishan are compared here on the figures this archive records for each, taken from the same sources and the same measurement convention. 19 other structures in this record opened within two years of Tiantaishan, which is the cohort it was designed alongside and the fairer comparison for how it was built.
Reading the figures
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo is the longer of the two at 16.94 km, ahead of Tiantaishan at 15.56 km, a difference of 1.38 km. Counting every class, 9 recorded structures fall between these two by length; the comparison is a window on that part of the record rather than a gap in it.
Across every class this archive records, St. Gotthard / San Gottardo stands 50th by length and Tiantaishan 60th, so the pair sits inside the top 60 of 244 structures. Both pass ten kilometres, which 161 of the 244 structures recorded here manage, so this is a comparison inside a small group rather than across the field.
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo opened in 1980 and Tiantaishan 41 years later in 2021, and that gap usually matters more than the length difference. Neither holds the record: Laerdal at 24.51 km is the longest road tunnel recorded here, 7.57 km ahead of St. Gotthard / San Gottardo. Length is measured portal to portal.
Tiantaishan was designed under the modern regime, with cross-passage spacing and emergency ventilation specified from the outset. A tunnel's gradient is often the more interesting figure, particularly on subsea crossings where vehicles have to climb back out. The oldest crossings still carrying traffic were built before any of the codes that now govern their upkeep.
Depth below sea level is recorded where published. A record for length has changed hands roughly once a decade since the 1870s. Motorway crossings are usually twinned, and the second bore is often driven decades after the first. Widening an existing bore is rarely economic, so capacity is added by driving a second one alongside.
Questions about this record
Which is longer, St. Gotthard / San Gottardo or Tiantaishan?
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo, at 16.94 km against 15.56 km — a difference of 1.38 km, or 8 per cent of the longer bore. Both are portal-to-portal figures as published by the operator or the responsible administration.
Was St. Gotthard / San Gottardo harder to build than Tiantaishan?
Not necessarily, and its 1.38 km of extra length is the weakest evidence available. Geology, water and the number of headings decide difficulty; Tiantaishan at 15.56 km may well have been the harder job, and nothing in a length column would show it.
Which of the two opened first?
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo, in 1980, 41 years before Tiantaishan in 2021. Both dates are the admission of traffic, so St. Gotthard / San Gottardo was already carrying it while Tiantaishan was still being driven.
Are the two figures measured the same way?
Yes. Both are recorded in this archive as road tunnels, portal to portal along the carriageway or track centre line, in metres, as published by the operator or the responsible administration.
Other pages in this section
- Arlberg vs Daliangshan No: length, opening date and class compared
- Bømlafjord vs Qing-Huang: length, opening date and class compared
- Changxing vs Bømlafjord: length, opening date and class compared
- Chunnel vs Yulhyeon: length, opening date and class compared
- Daliangshan No vs Muzhailing: length, opening date and class compared
- Eiksund vs Karmøy: length, opening date and class compared
- Gotthard Base vs Sei-kan: length, opening date and class compared
- Tunnel comparisons: length, depth and opening date, side by side
- Jinpingshan vs St. Gotthard / San Gottardo: length and opening date
- Karmøy vs Oslofjord: length, opening date and class compared
- Koralm vs New Guanjiao: length, opening date and class compared
- Laerdal vs Gotthard Base: length, opening date and class compared
- Laerdal vs Ryfylke: length, opening date and class compared
- Lötschberg vs Koralm: length, opening date and class compared
- Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco vs Fréjus: length, opening date, class
- Muzhailing vs Zigana: length, opening date and class compared
- New Guanjiao vs Guadarrama: length, opening date and class compared
- Qing-Huang vs Eiksund: length, opening date and class compared
- Ryfylke vs Eiksund: length, opening date and class compared
- Sandoy vs Tokyo Aqua: length, opening date and class compared
- Sei-kan vs Chunnel: length, opening date and class compared
- Shanghai Airport Link vs Songshan Lake: length and opening date
- Shenzhen vs Lötschberg: length, opening date and class compared
- Simplon-I vs Fréjus: length, opening date and class compared
- Songshan Lake vs Shenzhen: length, opening date and class compared
- St. Gotthard / San Gottardo vs Laerdal: length, opening date, class
- Tianshan Shengli vs Laerdal: length, opening date and class compared
- Tianshan Shengli vs Yamate: length, opening date and class compared
- Tiantaishan vs Arlberg: length, opening date and class compared
- Tokyo Aqua vs Changxing: length, opening date and class compared
- Yamate vs Zhongnanshan: length, opening date and class compared
- Yulhyeon vs Shanghai Airport Link: length, opening date and class
- Zhongnanshan vs Jinpingshan: length, opening date and class compared
- Zhongnanshan vs Laerdal: length, opening date and class compared
Cite this page
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo vs Tiantaishan: length and opening date. The World's Longest Tunnels. https://www.lotsberg.net/compare/st-gotthard-san-gottardo-vs-tiantaishan.html
Related record tables
- Tunnel comparisons: length, depth and opening date
- Laerdal vs Gotthard Base: length and opening date
- Laerdal vs Ryfylke: length and opening date
- St. Gotthard / San Gottardo vs Laerdal: length and opening year
- Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco vs Fréjus: length and opening date
- Zhongnanshan vs Laerdal: length and opening date
- Tianshan Shengli vs Laerdal: length and opening date
- Yamate vs Zhongnanshan: length and opening date
- Ryfylke vs Eiksund: length and opening date
- Simplon-I vs Fréjus: length and opening date
- Tianshan Shengli vs Yamate: length and opening date
- Zhongnanshan vs Jinpingshan: length and opening date