Both are recorded in this archive as road tunnels, so the measurement convention is identical and the comparison is direct. Laerdal is 1.45 times the length of St. Gotthard / San Gottardo, and it is the ratio rather than the 7.57 km that says how differently the two crossings had to be ventilated and escaped.
Among the road tunnels this archive records, St. Gotthard / San Gottardo stands 6th by length and Laerdal 1st, 5 places apart. St. Gotthard / San Gottardo belongs to the 1980s and Laerdal to the 2000s, two decades in which what a tunnel had to provide by way of escape and ventilation was not the same thing.
Both rows are reachable from the road tunnel table they were taken from, where the note column carries the tube count, the gradient and any reconstruction St. Gotthard / San Gottardo or Laerdal has had. Emergency lay-bys are spaced by regulation rather than by geometry, and their interval dates a crossing as clearly as its opening year.
- 5entries listed
Side by side
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo is recorded on data/tun10.html and Laerdal on data/tun10.html, compiled to the same convention, which is what makes the two figures comparable at all.
How this archive measures: lengths, bores, dates and ordering
| Measure | St. Gotthard / San Gottardo | Laerdal |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 16.94 km | 24.51 km |
| Length in metres | 16 942 m | 24 510 m |
| Opened | 1980 | 2000 |
| Class | road tunnel | road tunnel |
| Difference | 7.57 km shorter | — |
How this table is compiled
The median road tunnel in this archive measures 12.46 km, so both entries here are well clear of the ordinary case and the comparison is between two outliers rather than two typical crossings. Tunnels are regularly repurposed, and the mode a bore was built for is not always the mode it now carries.
A 20-year gap spans real changes in ventilation, escape provision and excavation method, so the two were not built to the same standard. The 1980s account for 25 entries in this archive, and St. Gotthard / San Gottardo is one of them, which is the context a single opening date does not carry on its own.
At over twenty kilometres Laerdal sits in the small group of bores long enough to need intermediate ventilation and a full escape regime. This archive separates 4 classes of structure and both entries here are indexed under road tunnel, which decides the table each is ranked in and the convention its length was measured by.
That gap is about 31 per cent of the longer bore, which is the figure worth holding on to rather than the raw metres. Driven end to end the two would run 41.45 km, which is the figure to hold against the 24.51 km of the longest single road tunnel in the record.
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo and Laerdal are compared here on the figures this archive records for each, taken from the same sources and the same measurement convention. 18 other structures in this record opened within two years of Laerdal, which is the cohort it was designed alongside and the fairer comparison for how it was built.
Reading the figures
Laerdal is the longer of the two at 24.51 km, ahead of St. Gotthard / San Gottardo at 16.94 km, a difference of 7.57 km. Counting every class, 29 recorded structures fall between these two by length; the comparison is a window on that part of the record rather than a gap in it.
Across every class this archive records, Laerdal stands 20th by length and St. Gotthard / San Gottardo 50th, so the pair sits inside the top 50 of 244 structures. Both pass ten kilometres, which 161 of the 244 structures recorded here manage, so this is a comparison inside a small group rather than across the field.
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo opened in 1980 and Laerdal 20 years later in 2000, and that gap usually matters more than the length difference. Laerdal is the longest road tunnel in this archive, which makes this comparison one against the record itself rather than two entries below it. Sources are named on each structure's own table.
4 recorded road tunnels fall between them by length, the nearest being Tianshan Shengli at 22.13 km. Motorway crossings are usually twinned, and the second bore is often driven decades after the first. Ventilation shafts allow a longer bore to be driven, and their absence is often what caps a tunnel's length rather than money or ambition.
19 recorded structures are longer than Laerdal, the nearest of them Pajares Base at 24.6 km. Water under pressure delays a heading more reliably than distance does, and it appears in no ranking. A national administration publishes what it maintains, so a crossing that changes owner can move between lists.
Questions about this record
Which is longer, St. Gotthard / San Gottardo or Laerdal?
Laerdal, at 24.51 km against 16.94 km — a difference of 7.57 km, or 31 per cent of the longer bore. Both are portal-to-portal figures as published by the operator or the responsible administration.
Was Laerdal harder to build than St. Gotthard / San Gottardo?
Not necessarily, and its 7.57 km of extra length is the weakest evidence available. Geology, water and the number of headings decide difficulty; St. Gotthard / San Gottardo at 16.94 km may well have been the harder job, and nothing in a length column would show it.
Which of the two opened first?
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo, in 1980, 20 years before Laerdal in 2000. Both dates are the admission of traffic, so St. Gotthard / San Gottardo was already carrying it while Laerdal was still being driven.
Are the two figures measured the same way?
Yes. Both are recorded in this archive as road tunnels, portal to portal along the carriageway or track centre line, in metres, as published by the operator or the responsible administration.
Other pages in this section
- Arlberg vs Daliangshan No: length, opening date and class compared
- Bømlafjord vs Qing-Huang: length, opening date and class compared
- Changxing vs Bømlafjord: length, opening date and class compared
- Chunnel vs Yulhyeon: length, opening date and class compared
- Daliangshan No vs Muzhailing: length, opening date and class compared
- Eiksund vs Karmøy: length, opening date and class compared
- Gotthard Base vs Sei-kan: length, opening date and class compared
- Tunnel comparisons: length, depth and opening date, side by side
- Jinpingshan vs St. Gotthard / San Gottardo: length and opening date
- Karmøy vs Oslofjord: length, opening date and class compared
- Koralm vs New Guanjiao: length, opening date and class compared
- Laerdal vs Gotthard Base: length, opening date and class compared
- Laerdal vs Ryfylke: length, opening date and class compared
- Lötschberg vs Koralm: length, opening date and class compared
- Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco vs Fréjus: length, opening date, class
- Muzhailing vs Zigana: length, opening date and class compared
- New Guanjiao vs Guadarrama: length, opening date and class compared
- Qing-Huang vs Eiksund: length, opening date and class compared
- Ryfylke vs Eiksund: length, opening date and class compared
- Sandoy vs Tokyo Aqua: length, opening date and class compared
- Sei-kan vs Chunnel: length, opening date and class compared
- Shanghai Airport Link vs Songshan Lake: length and opening date
- Shenzhen vs Lötschberg: length, opening date and class compared
- Simplon-I vs Fréjus: length, opening date and class compared
- Songshan Lake vs Shenzhen: length, opening date and class compared
- St. Gotthard / San Gottardo vs Tiantaishan: length and opening date
- Tianshan Shengli vs Laerdal: length, opening date and class compared
- Tianshan Shengli vs Yamate: length, opening date and class compared
- Tiantaishan vs Arlberg: length, opening date and class compared
- Tokyo Aqua vs Changxing: length, opening date and class compared
- Yamate vs Zhongnanshan: length, opening date and class compared
- Yulhyeon vs Shanghai Airport Link: length, opening date and class
- Zhongnanshan vs Jinpingshan: length, opening date and class compared
- Zhongnanshan vs Laerdal: length, opening date and class compared
Cite this page
St. Gotthard / San Gottardo vs Laerdal: length, opening date, class. The World's Longest Tunnels. https://www.lotsberg.net/compare/st-gotthard-san-gottardo-vs-laerdal.html
Related record tables
- Tunnel comparisons: length, depth and opening date
- Laerdal vs Gotthard Base: length and opening date
- Laerdal vs Ryfylke: length and opening date
- Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco vs Fréjus: length and opening date
- Zhongnanshan vs Laerdal: length and opening date
- Tianshan Shengli vs Laerdal: length and opening date
- Yamate vs Zhongnanshan: length and opening date
- Ryfylke vs Eiksund: length and opening date
- Simplon-I vs Fréjus: length and opening date
- Tianshan Shengli vs Yamate: length and opening date
- Zhongnanshan vs Jinpingshan: length and opening date
- Jinpingshan vs St. Gotthard / San Gottardo: length compared