Both are recorded in this archive as road tunnels, so the measurement convention is identical and the comparison is direct. Fréjus is 1.11 times the length of Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco, and it is the ratio rather than the 1.29 km that says how differently the two crossings had to be ventilated and escaped.
Among the road tunnels this archive records, Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco stands 28th by length and Fréjus 21st, 7 places apart. The median road tunnel in this archive measures 12.46 km, so both entries here are well clear of the ordinary case and the comparison is between two outliers rather than two typical crossings.
Neither holds the record: Laerdal at 24.51 km is the longest road tunnel recorded here, 11.61 km ahead of Fréjus. Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco belongs to the 1960s and Fréjus to the 1980s, two decades in which what a tunnel had to provide by way of escape and ventilation was not the same thing.
- 5entries listed
Side by side
Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco is recorded on data/tun10.html and Fréjus on data/tun10.html, compiled to the same convention, which is what makes the two figures comparable at all.
How this archive measures: lengths, bores, dates and ordering
| Measure | Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco | Fréjus |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 11.61 km | 12.9 km |
| Length in metres | 11 611 m | 12 898 m |
| Opened | 1965 | 1980 |
| Class | road tunnel | road tunnel |
| Difference | 1.29 km shorter | — |
How this table is compiled
Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco opened in 1965 and Fréjus 15 years later in 1980, and that gap usually matters more than the length difference. Both rows are reachable from the road tunnel table they were taken from, where the note column carries the tube count, the gradient and any reconstruction Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco or Fréjus has had.
A 15-year gap spans real changes in ventilation, escape provision and excavation method, so the two were not built to the same standard. This archive separates 4 classes of structure and both entries here are indexed under road tunnel, which decides the table each is ranked in and the convention its length was measured by.
That gap is about 10 per cent of the longer bore, which is the figure worth holding on to rather than the raw metres. Driven end to end the two would run 24.51 km, which is the figure to hold against the 24.51 km of the longest single road tunnel in the record.
The 1960s account for 6 entries in this archive, and Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco is one of them, which is the context a single opening date does not carry on its own. A crossing driven from both ends meets in the middle, and the survey needed to make that happen is invisible in the finished figure.
Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco and Fréjus are compared here on the figures this archive records for each, taken from the same sources and the same measurement convention. 9 other structures in this record opened within two years of Fréjus, which is the cohort it was designed alongside and the fairer comparison for how it was built.
Reading the figures
Fréjus is the longer of the two at 12.9 km, ahead of Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco at 11.61 km, a difference of 1.29 km. Counting every class, 12 recorded structures fall between these two by length; the comparison is a window on that part of the record rather than a gap in it.
Across every class this archive records, Fréjus stands 110th by length and Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco 123rd, so the pair sits inside the top 123 of 244 structures. Both pass ten kilometres, which 161 of the 244 structures recorded here manage, so this is a comparison inside a small group rather than across the field.
Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco predates the safety regulation written after the fires of 1999 to 2001, and was retrofitted rather than designed to it. Nothing in either row is estimated: a value that could not be corroborated is left blank rather than filled in. Linings are inspected on a cycle of years and repaired in windows of hours.
109 recorded structures are longer than Fréjus, the nearest of them Hsuehshan at 12.94 km. Two crossings of the same length built fifty years apart are different objects and only the number is comparable. Trade reporting is faster than official publication and less reliable, which is why opening dates sometimes move after the event.
6 recorded road tunnels fall between them by length, the nearest being Guigala at 12.79 km. The note column carries the qualifications. The loading gauge sizes a railway bore, and a tunnel built for one country's stock can refuse another's. A record for length has changed hands roughly once a decade since the 1870s.
Questions about this record
Which is longer, Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco or Fréjus?
Fréjus, at 12.9 km against 11.61 km — a difference of 1.29 km, or 10 per cent of the longer bore. Both are portal-to-portal figures as published by the operator or the responsible administration.
Was Fréjus harder to build than Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco?
Not necessarily, and its 1.29 km of extra length is the weakest evidence available. Geology, water and the number of headings decide difficulty; Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco at 11.61 km may well have been the harder job, and nothing in a length column would show it.
Which of the two opened first?
Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco, in 1965, 15 years before Fréjus in 1980. Both dates are the admission of traffic, so Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco was already carrying it while Fréjus was still being driven.
Are the two figures measured the same way?
Yes. Both are recorded in this archive as road tunnels, portal to portal along the carriageway or track centre line, in metres, as published by the operator or the responsible administration.
Other pages in this section
- Arlberg vs Daliangshan No: length, opening date and class compared
- Bømlafjord vs Qing-Huang: length, opening date and class compared
- Changxing vs Bømlafjord: length, opening date and class compared
- Chunnel vs Yulhyeon: length, opening date and class compared
- Daliangshan No vs Muzhailing: length, opening date and class compared
- Eiksund vs Karmøy: length, opening date and class compared
- Gotthard Base vs Sei-kan: length, opening date and class compared
- Tunnel comparisons: length, depth and opening date, side by side
- Jinpingshan vs St. Gotthard / San Gottardo: length and opening date
- Karmøy vs Oslofjord: length, opening date and class compared
- Koralm vs New Guanjiao: length, opening date and class compared
- Laerdal vs Gotthard Base: length, opening date and class compared
- Laerdal vs Ryfylke: length, opening date and class compared
- Lötschberg vs Koralm: length, opening date and class compared
- Muzhailing vs Zigana: length, opening date and class compared
- New Guanjiao vs Guadarrama: length, opening date and class compared
- Qing-Huang vs Eiksund: length, opening date and class compared
- Ryfylke vs Eiksund: length, opening date and class compared
- Sandoy vs Tokyo Aqua: length, opening date and class compared
- Sei-kan vs Chunnel: length, opening date and class compared
- Shanghai Airport Link vs Songshan Lake: length and opening date
- Shenzhen vs Lötschberg: length, opening date and class compared
- Simplon-I vs Fréjus: length, opening date and class compared
- Songshan Lake vs Shenzhen: length, opening date and class compared
- St. Gotthard / San Gottardo vs Laerdal: length, opening date, class
- St. Gotthard / San Gottardo vs Tiantaishan: length and opening date
- Tianshan Shengli vs Laerdal: length, opening date and class compared
- Tianshan Shengli vs Yamate: length, opening date and class compared
- Tiantaishan vs Arlberg: length, opening date and class compared
- Tokyo Aqua vs Changxing: length, opening date and class compared
- Yamate vs Zhongnanshan: length, opening date and class compared
- Yulhyeon vs Shanghai Airport Link: length, opening date and class
- Zhongnanshan vs Jinpingshan: length, opening date and class compared
- Zhongnanshan vs Laerdal: length, opening date and class compared
Cite this page
Mont-Blanc / Monte Bianco vs Fréjus: length, opening date, class. The World's Longest Tunnels. https://www.lotsberg.net/compare/mont-blanc-monte-bianco-vs-frejus.html
Related record tables
- Tunnel comparisons: length, depth and opening date
- Laerdal vs Gotthard Base: length and opening date
- Laerdal vs Ryfylke: length and opening date
- St. Gotthard / San Gottardo vs Laerdal: length and opening year
- Zhongnanshan vs Laerdal: length and opening date
- Tianshan Shengli vs Laerdal: length and opening date
- Yamate vs Zhongnanshan: length and opening date
- Ryfylke vs Eiksund: length and opening date
- Simplon-I vs Fréjus: length and opening date
- Tianshan Shengli vs Yamate: length and opening date
- Zhongnanshan vs Jinpingshan: length and opening date
- Jinpingshan vs St. Gotthard / San Gottardo: length compared