Geology decides cost and programme far more than distance does, and a short bore in bad ground can outlast a long one in sound rock. Length is the dimension published most consistently across countries, which is why it usually governs an ordering, but it is a poor measure of difficulty.
Geological variability cuts the other way: blasting adapts round by round, while a machine is committed to the ground it was specified for. Forecasts on schemes this size move by years. Records in this field move whenever one large scheme opens, and a page that is not re-checked drifts out of date without announcing it.
Profile matters more than it appears. A machine bores a circle, and a road tunnel needs a flat floor and a wide crown. Ventilation type constrains how long a bore can be driven without intermediate shafts, and its absence is often what caps a tunnel's length. The date of verification is published with the table.
- 8entries listed
The record table
A comparison on the axes that decide real contracts. Neither method is better in the abstract; the crossover point is set by drive length, geology and how much the surface above can tolerate.
How this archive measures: lengths, bores, dates and ordering
| Axis | Drill and blast | Tunnel boring machine |
|---|---|---|
| Up-front cost | Low: rigs and explosives are mobilised quickly | High: a machine is designed and built for the drive, taking a year or more |
| Cost per metre on a long drive | Higher, and roughly constant | Lower once the machine is paid for, so long drives favour it |
| Break-even drive length | Favoured below roughly 2 to 3 km | Favoured above that, depending on ground |
| Geological variability | Tolerant: the method adapts round by round | Intolerant: a machine specified for the wrong ground can stall for months |
| Profile | Any shape, including horseshoe and enlargements | Circular only, which wastes section on a road tunnel |
| Surface impact | Vibration and noise, often unacceptable in cities | Low, which is why urban work is almost all machine-driven |
| Curvature | Tight curves are straightforward | Limited by shield length |
| Overbreak and lining | More overbreak, shotcrete support | Precise bore, segmental lining erected behind the shield |
How this table is compiled
Drill and blast mobilises in weeks; a boring machine takes a year or more to design and build for its drive. Corrections have historically arrived by letter rather than by form, and that is still how most errors in it have been found. Where a figure could not be corroborated it was left out.
Once the machine is paid for, its cost per metre falls below drill and blast, so long drives favour it heavily. Comparing one country's practice against a neighbour's is more informative than reading either alone. Where a structure belongs to two classes it appears on both tables, which is not double counting but two different measurements.
This comparison is set out on the axes that decide real contracts rather than on which method sounds more modern. Blasting can produce any shape, including the enlargements needed for laybys, cross-passages and ventilation plant. Cost figures are excluded for a harder reason: currency, inflation and differing project scope make them close to meaningless in comparison.
This archive has recorded tunnel data since the late 1990s, compiled from operator publications, national administrations and the engineering press. Twin-tube crossings frequently show two slightly different lengths, because the two carriageways rarely follow the same line through the rock. Cross-passage spacing, fixed firefighting and emergency ventilation control are what modern safety regulation actually governs.
Neither is better in the abstract, and most large schemes use both on different sections of the same alignment. That asymmetry is why short tunnels are still blasted even in countries with a deep machine-tunnelling industry. Subaqueous tunnels are governed by rock cover above the bore rather than by the depth of water above that.
Reading the figures
In cities the decision is usually made for the engineer: vibration and noise limits rule blasting out entirely. Tunnel engineering is a field where the qualifications attached to a number matter more than the number itself. A base tunnel trades a much greater length for a far lower summit altitude and a gentler ruling gradient.
The archive grew through correspondence with engineers and administrations in more than twenty countries, and still does. Figures are checked against one another where sources disagree, and the disagreement is recorded rather than resolved silently. Reading the qualification before the figure is usually the faster route to understanding what a claim actually says.
Gradient limits are the main reason railway tunnels run longer than road tunnels on the same crossing. Traffic figures are excluded throughout this archive, because they date far faster than the structures themselves. Rows are ordered so that the head of the table answers the question most readers arrive with.
Ground conditions belong with every advance rate. A contained fire is more instructive than an uncontained one. Dates use the day, month and year the event occurred. The table is short because the sourcing bar is high. Promoter figures are used where no independent one exists. The note column is worth reading before the number.
Minor incidents are listed alongside the serious ones. Two independent sources were required for each row. Opening year means the year traffic was admitted. Deaths are the figures established by official inquiry. Disputed values carry the dispute in the note column. Every figure here is traceable to a named source.
Nothing below is interpolated or rounded up. Segmental linings are erected behind the shield. Secondary summaries were not used as a source. Height is measured above mean sea level. Metres are used for structures, kilometres for routes. Forecast dates are forecasts, and they move. Spoil is removed back through the machine.
Questions about this record
Is a TBM cheaper than drill and blast?
Not up front. A machine has to be designed and built for its drive, which takes a year or more, so short tunnels are usually still blasted. On a long drive the cost per metre falls below blasting and the machine wins.
Where is the break-even drive length?
Roughly two to three kilometres, though it depends heavily on geology and on how variable that geology is. Blasting adapts to changing ground round by round; a machine is committed to the ground it was specified for.
How is this page sourced?
From operator publications, national administrations, official inquiry reports and the engineering press. Every figure was corroborated from at least two independent sources; anything that could not be is left out rather than estimated.
How current is this page?
It reflects the state of the archive at the last check recorded on it. A page of this kind goes out of date when a scheme opens or an inquiry reports, so a figure worth relying on should be read together with the date the page states rather than assumed to be today's.
Other pages in this section
Cite this page
TBM versus drill and blast: how the choice is made, and what it costs. The World's Longest Tunnels. https://www.lotsberg.net/tunnelling/tbm-vs-drill-and-blast.html
Related record tables
- Tunnel fires and accidents: the incident record
- Fire accidents in road tunnels: the full record
- Railway and metro tunnel accidents: the full record
- How tunnels are built: methods, machines and ground
- Tunnel boring machines: how they work, types and records
- TBM cost and advance rate: what the figures mean
- Tunnels under construction: the project tracker
- Brenner Base Tunnel: length, depth and opening date
- Fehmarnbelt tunnel: the longest immersed tunnel
- Rogfast: the deepest and longest subsea road tunnel
- Mont d'Ambin Base Tunnel: the Turin to Lyon base tunnel
- Atal and Zojila: India's high-altitude highway tunnels